Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Recent studies into the origins of COVID-19 have brought scientists closer to identifying the animals that may have played a crucial role in transferring the virus to humans. This ongoing investigation aims to trace back the roots of the pandemic to the wildlife involved.
Researchers examined genetic material from the Wuhan market where the initial outbreak occurred. Their findings suggest that the most probable animals linked to the spread are raccoon dogs, civet cats, and bamboo rats. It is believed that these infected animals were introduced to the Wuhan market in late November 2019, setting off the global pandemic.
Michael Worobey, a co-author of the study and an evolutionary biologist at the University of Arizona, indicated that the research has helped identify potential subpopulations of these animals that might have contributed to the virus’s transmission. This knowledge could aid scientists in locating the natural reservoir of COVID-19.
Worobey mentioned that specific raccoon dogs at the market belonged to a sub-species more commonly found in southern China, which may lead scientists to trace the origins and distribution of these animals. This could initiate sampling efforts in local bat populations, especially since bats are known carriers of coronaviruses related to SARS.
Despite the evidence supporting an animal origin for COVID-19, it does not put an end to the ongoing and contentious debate about a potential lab escape of the virus. Mark Woolhouse, a professor at the University of Edinburgh, pointed out that the new genetic findings suggest the pandemic had “evolutionary roots in the market” and that it is improbable for COVID-19 to have been infecting people before it was first reported at the Huanan market.
Woolhouse remarked that while this discovery provides significant support for the animal origin theory, it still does not provide definitive proof.
A World Health Organization (WHO) expert panel concluded in 2021 that the virus likely made the jump to humans from animals, ruling out the lab leak theory as “extremely unlikely.” However, WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus later indicated that it was “premature” to dismiss the possibility of a lab incident.
An investigation by the AP in April revealed a lack of progression in the search for the virus’s origins, hindered by political divisions and missed opportunities from health authorities to refine the inquiry.
Scientists acknowledge that the precise origin of the virus may never be definitively known. The latest study, published in the journal Cell, brought together researchers from Europe, the U.S., and Australia who analyzed data released by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. They examined 800 samples collected on January 1, 2020, just a day after the Wuhan authorities alerted about an unspecified respiratory virus.
While previous genetic sequencing was published by Chinese scientists last year, there was no identification of the particular animals that might have been infected. The current analysis employed advanced techniques capable of discerning specific organisms from a complex mixture of environmental genetic material.
Worobey explained that this research offers an important view of the situation in the market before the pandemic took hold, and emphasizes the need for genetic studies like theirs to help clarify how the virus might have first begun its spread.
Nonetheless, Woolhouse noted that several fundamental questions remain unresolved. He acknowledged the clear evidence that COVID was present at the bustling market, which housed numerous animals, yet the essential query of how the virus originally arrived there remains open.
Understanding the origins of the coronavirus is crucial for preventing future outbreaks, making these studies significant in the broader context of public health.
Source: Associated Press