Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Beyoncé Issues Cease-and-Desist to Trump Over ‘Freedom’ Use

Beyoncé has initiated legal proceedings against former President Donald Trump’s campaign, accusing them of using her song “Freedom” in a social media video without authorization. RollingStone reports that the track, which is notably linked with Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign, appeared in a 13-second clip posted by Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung on X, formerly known as Twitter. The video, featuring Trump disembarking from a plane in Michigan, prominently showcased the song, prompting Beyoncé’s legal team to issue a cease-and-desist.

A source close to Beyoncé confirmed that the Trump campaign neither sought nor obtained permission to use the track. Despite the cease-and-desist order, the video remained on Cheung’s X account as of Wednesday afternoon. This incident highlights a recurring issue with Trump’s campaign, which has previously faced criticism for recurrently using artists’ music without consent.

Beyoncé’s track “Freedom” has been a significant component of Kamala Harris’ campaign, extensively utilized in various campaign materials and events. The song was notably featured in Harris’ initial campaign ad and played at numerous public appearances. Beyoncé had authorized its use by Harris, distinguishing it clearly from the unauthorized use by Trump’s campaign.

Trump’s campaign has had a history of using music by artists without proper authorization, often leading to legal threats and pushback. This latest incident exemplifies the ongoing friction between the former president’s team and the music industry. While the Trump campaign’s spokesperson defended the use of the song, claiming it was a form of free promotion, Beyoncé’s legal team remains firm in opposing the unauthorized use.

As this legal battle progresses, Beyoncé’s action underscores the critical importance of respecting intellectual property rights and securing appropriate permissions for copyrighted material. The resolution of this case could set a significant precedent for future disputes involving music and political campaigns.

Source: RollingStone