Biden Administration Launches Second Major Action Against Google

The Biden administration is embarking on a significant legal confrontation against tech giant Google, marking what could be a turning point in how the company operates. In Alexandria, Virginia, the Justice Department, along with several state attorneys general, will argue that Google has unlawfully monopolized the U.S. digital advertising market, which is valued at nearly $300 billion.

This effort aims to dismantle Google’s stronghold, a challenge not undertaken since the Justice Department’s case against Microsoft in the early 2000s and not successfully achieved since the historic breakup of AT&T in the 1980s. Bill Baer, a fellow at the Brookings Institution and former antitrust chief at the DOJ during the Obama administration, remarked that an attack of this magnitude hasn’t been pursued in decades.

The legal action against Google is positioned as a major component of the Biden administration’s economic strategy, emphasizing antitrust enforcement. However, a verdict may not arrive until long after the upcoming election, and the trial’s duration might even push the ruling into the next presidential administration.

Google continues to face significant scrutiny both domestically and internationally. Recently, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., determined that the company had illegally controlled the online search market, following a ten-week trial. While a definitive path forward hasn’t been outlined by the DOJ, potential remedies might include divesting key products like its Android operating system and Chrome browser.

Pundits expect that the timeline for resolving these cases will not be swift. At the recent hearing, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta suggested he would deliver a ruling on Google’s required modifications by August of the following year, taking into account the evolving landscape of technology, particularly concerning the integration of artificial intelligence into online search, a factor not considered during the initial trial.

Google has indicated its intention to appeal the prior ruling, and at the same time, it is fighting regulatory battles around the globe. In Europe, the company is entrenched in enforcement actions that could lead to significant fines or even a breakup. Countries such as Japan, South Korea, Australia, and South Africa have also accused Google of anti-competitive practices concerning its search and app store operations. Recently, the United Kingdom joined in with similar accusations regarding Google’s advertising practices.

Economic analysts, like Cristina Caffarra, believe Google is facing serious challenges, as indicated by the numerous global antitrust cases against the company. Despite Google’s significant resources to combat lawsuits and absorb potential fines, the ongoing legal battles are intense. Paul Gallant from TD Securities stated that the current regulatory pressures signify the first substantial threat Google has encountered.

While Google has historically acknowledged its dominant position in internet search, it claims this monopoly results from offering superior products and maintaining healthy competition with other major companies like Microsoft, Apple, and Amazon. Google also argues that its search dominance is declining as more information becomes available online.

The trial beginning Monday will highlight allegations that Google monopolizes the online advertising space, controlling the systems that facilitate ad transactions, including software used for real-time ad auctions. Although both parties have significant stakes in the outcome, the litigation may proceed with less drama than the earlier search case. Google CEO Sundar Pichai is not anticipated to testify, but dozens of lower-level executives as well as representatives from media titan Disney and The New York Times are expected in court.

The complex nature of the online ad market poses challenges for the DOJ. Vanderbilt law professor Rebecca Haw Allensworth noted the intricacies that the government will need to clarify for the judge, contrasting it with the more straightforward nature of search engine usage, which is universally understood.

The DOJ’s lawsuit alleges that Google has maintained its power in online advertising through a series of acquisitions and business practices that have evolved over the past 15 years. Google significantly relies on advertising revenues, generating around $74 billion in 2023 through this sector alone.

In another significant antitrust issue for Google, a jury in San Francisco recently found against the company regarding its operations of the Google Play App Store. A final ruling in that case could reshape the competitive landscape for other app stores.

Moreover, U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema criticized Google for its practice of deleting potentially incriminating messages over several years, stating this would influence her evaluation of witness credibility.

In the context of online advertising, Google earns approximately 30 cents for every dollar advertisers spend via its tools, as cited in the DOJ’s complaint. The online ad market space for Google arose from multiple acquisitions, which the DOJ plans to scrutinize closely, identifying specific segments of its advertising business that may need to be divested.

Despite these allegations, Google contends that the advertising market is fiercely competitive, pointing to rivals such as Amazon and Meta. In a recent blog post, Google affirmed it would demonstrate that ad buyers have a plethora of choices and opt for its services due to their efficiency and effectiveness.

The trial’s outcome will hinge on which side can convincingly argue its narrative of the online advertising marketplace. Google maintains the DOJ fails to recognize the competition from various digital advertising entities, while the DOJ will likely provide evidence that differentiates the various forms of online ads and asserts they aren’t perfectly interchangeable.

The trial is set to progress swiftly in the Virginia court, a venue known for its expedited resolutions. Following this trial, the DOJ plans to assess whether Google violated antitrust laws and will determine the appropriate course of action for any violations discovered. The ongoing cases against Google are separate but interconnected, raising the challenge for the government to synchronize their remedies without creating inconsistencies.

Source: source names