Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Trump Seeks Delay for Hush Money Sentencing Until After Election

Former President Donald Trump is requesting a postponement of sentencing in his hush money case, aiming to delay it until after the 2024 presidential election. His legal team argues that the current sentencing date of September 18 aligns with what they describe as the prosecutors’ “naked election-interference objectives.”

Judge Juan Merchan had previously deferred sentencing at Trump’s request after the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent ruling regarding presidential immunity. The initial sentencing was set for July 11, but following a ruling, Judge Merchan indicated that he would decide on Trump’s immunity claim on September 16, with sentencing to take place two days later.

In a letter addressed to the judge on Thursday, Trump’s defense team highlighted the problematic timing. They expressed concern that there could be as little as one day between the announcement of a significant ruling regarding presidential immunity and the sentencing, which they deemed unreasonable and unwarranted.

The lawyers also raised questions about the implications of holding sentencing just as early voting begins. They contended that such timing could undermine the integrity of the judicial process.

“Setting aside the naked election-interference objectives, there is no valid countervailing reason for the Court to maintain the current sentencing date,” the defense asserted. They emphasized that there is no justification for rushing the proceedings.

Tom Brenner/Reuters – Former U.S. President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during a campaign event in Philadelphia, June 22, 2024.

Trump’s request for a sentencing delay comes shortly after Judge Merchan publicly rebuked his legal team for putting forth “inaccurate and unsubstantiated claims.” This criticism arose from their motion for the judge to recuse himself, citing a supposed conflict of interest associated with Merchan’s daughter and Vice President Kamala Harris, which Merchan rejected.

Even after the denial of their recusal motion, Trump’s attorneys reiterated their concerns about “conflicts and appearances of impropriety,” urging the judge to reconsider the sentencing schedule.

In May, Trump was convicted of all 34 counts related to falsifying business records, linked to a hush money payment made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. This payment was intended to enhance his electoral chances during the 2016 presidential campaign.

As the situation unfolds, the implications of the court’s decisions may extend beyond the legal realm and into the political landscape, raising questions about the intersection of judicial proceedings and electoral processes.

With the election season heating up, Trump’s legal issues may play a significant role in shaping public opinion and voter turnout. The timing and outcomes of upcoming hearings and decisions could influence not only Trump’s campaign but also the broader dynamics of the 2024 election.

As the September 18 sentencing date approaches, all eyes will be on the courtroom and the potential effects of legal rulings on Trump’s political ambitions. The interplay between the judicial system and electoral considerations continues to draw attention, highlighting the complexities of modern American politics.

Source: ABC News