8 Best 4K OLED Monitors in 2026

You have just finished a long session of gaming or photo editing, and you look at your monitor. The blacks are gray, the colors look washed out, and the backlight bleeds into the corners. That moment is when you start thinking about OLED. The contrast is infinite, the response is instant, and the color volume makes everything pop. But choosing the best 4K OLED monitor is harder than it should be. There are 32-inch QD-OLED panels, 27-inch glossy screens, one ultrawide Alienware with a curve, and a handful of dual-mode monitors that can switch between high resolution and high frame rates. We have sorted through the current lineup to find the eight best 4K OLED monitors in 2026, covering the picks that make sense for different setups, budgets, and use cases. Whether you need a gaming workhorse, a creator's color-accurate panel, or something that bridges both worlds, there is a monitor here for you.

TL;DR: The ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM is the one most people should buy: it has the best combination of QD-OLED image quality, 240Hz speed, and a heatsink that protects against burn-in. The MSI MPG 321URX is a nearly identical panel at a more competitive position for the same class. The LG 32GX850A brings a unique dual-mode that switches between 4K 165Hz and FHD 330Hz, making it ideal for players who play both story and competitive shooters. The Alienware AW3425DW is the only ultrawide here, and if you want the immersion of a curved 34-inch screen, it is the one to get.

#	Product	Size / Resolution / Refresh / Panel	Best for
1	ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM	32" 4K 240Hz QD-OLED	The overall best 4K OLED monitor for anyone who wants top-tier gaming and HDR without compromise
2	ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG	27" 4K 240Hz QD-OLED (4th gen)	Gamers who prefer a 27-inch screen size and want the latest OLED anti-flicker tech
3	LG 32GX850A-B UltraGear	32" 4K 165Hz (dual-mode 330Hz) Glossy WOLED	Competitive players who want both high-res visuals and a 330Hz mode for fast games
4	MSI MPG 321URX	32" 4K 240Hz QD-OLED	Buyers who want the same 32-inch QD-OLED panel as the ASUS Swift but with a KVM and a different approach to OLED care
5	ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCWMG	32" 4K 240Hz (dual-mode 480Hz) Glossy WOLED	Players who want the highest possible refresh rate in FHD mode and a zero-haze glossy surface
6	ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM	27" 4K 240Hz QD-OLED (4th gen, DP 2.1a)	Enthusiasts who need DisplayPort 2.1a UHBR20 bandwidth for uncompressed 4K 240Hz
7	ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDMR	32" 4K 240Hz QD-OLED (DP 2.1)	Users who want the 32-inch QD-OLED experience with the latest DisplayPort 2.1 connectivity
8	Alienware AW3425DW	34" 3440×1440 240Hz QD-OLED (ultrawide)	Those who want an ultrawide immersive experience with OLED colors

How We Picked

• Panel technology matters most. The difference between QD-OLED and WOLED is real: QD-OLED uses quantum dots to achieve higher color volume and brightness, while WOLED with a glossy coat (like the LG 32GX850A and ASUS XG32UCWMG) can look punchy in a dark room but has a slight white subpixel structure that affects text clarity. We weighed which panel type suits different priorities: pure color gamut vs. a sharper glossy image.
• Refresh rate and dual-mode flexibility. A 240Hz refresh rate is now standard for 4K OLEDs, but a few monitors offer a dual-mode feature that lets you switch to a lower resolution (FHD) for a higher refresh rate (330Hz or 480Hz). This is a genuine advantage if you play both single-player games at 4K and competitive shooters where every millisecond counts.
• Burn-in prevention and longevity. OLED panels are susceptible to permanent image retention, so manufacturers have built in custom heatsinks, graphene films, and pixel refresh routines. We looked for monitors with robust OLED care features, including proximity sensors that detect when you walk away and switch the screen off.
• Connectivity and bandwidth. To drive 4K at 240Hz without compression, you need either DSC (which is nearly lossless) or a DisplayPort 2.1 connection. Monitors with DP 2.1a UHBR20 (like the PG27UCDM) can handle full bandwidth, while others rely on HDMI 2.1 or DP 1.4 with DSC. For most people, DSC is fine, but if you want uncompromised signal, the newer DP 2.1 ports are worth the premium.
• Ergonomics and adjustments. A good stand that lets you tilt, swivel, pivot, and adjust height matters when you sit in front of a monitor for hours. We preferred models with sturdy, tool-free stands.
• Warranty and burn-in coverage. Because OLED burn-in remains a concern, we gave extra credit to monitors that come with a standard three-year warranty that explicitly covers burn-in, as ASUS and MSI do.

---

1. ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM: Best Overall

Pros

• Exceptional QD-OLED image quality with 99% DCI-P3 and true 10-bit color
• Custom heatsink and graphene film for better heat management and lower burn-in risk
• 240Hz refresh rate and 0.03ms response time for buttery-smooth gameplay
• 90W USB-C power delivery for charging a laptop
• DisplayWidget Center gives mouse-based access to OLED care settings

Cons

• Stand is large and takes up desk space (no pivot)
• No DisplayPort 2.1 (uses DP 1.4 with DSC)
• Slightly lower peak brightness in some HDR scenes compared to newer WOLED glossy panels

Best for The gamer who wants the best all-round 4K OLED monitor and doesn't want to sacrifice color accuracy for peak brightness.

Check current price on Amazon →

The ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM is the monitor that set the standard for 32-inch 4K OLEDs when it launched in early 2024, and it remains the most popular pick in its category. The QD-OLED panel produces colors that look almost unreal: reds are deep, greens are vivid, and skin tones look natural without the oversaturation that some WOLED panels can show. The custom heatsink paired with a graphene film does an impressive job of keeping the panel cool, which directly reduces the risk of burn-in over years of use. The 240Hz refresh rate is smooth enough for competitive gaming, and the 0.03ms response time means motion is crisp with zero ghosting.

Where the PG32UCDM falls a little short is brightness in bright HDR highlights. The VESA DisplayHDR 400 True Black certification ensures deep blacks and good contrast, but a glossy WOLED like the XG32UCWMG can look punchier in a bright room. The stand is also a bit of a footprint hog; if you have a shallow desk, you might prefer a monitor arm. Still, for the combination of color, speed, and built-in burn-in protection, this is the one we would recommend to most people.

---

2. ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG: Best 27-Inch 4K OLED

Pros

• Fourth-gen QD-OLED panel with sharper text and longer lifespan
• OLED Anti-Flicker 2.0 reduces flicker by 20% over previous gen
• Neo Proximity Sensor automatically turns the screen off when you step away
• 90W USB-C and HDMI 2.1 connectivity
• Three-year warranty with burn-in coverage

Cons

• 27-inch may feel small for 4K if you want more screen real estate
• No DisplayPort 2.1 (DP 1.4 with DSC)
• Glossy screen can show reflections in bright rooms

Best for Gamers who prefer a 27-inch form factor and want the latest QD-OLED generation with the best anti-flicker technology.

Check current price on Amazon →

The ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG is a more recent release (mid-2025) and it brings ASUS's fourth-generation QD-OLED panel to the 27-inch size. The big upgrade here is OLED Anti-Flicker 2.0, which uses a new luminance compensation algorithm to reduce flicker perceptibly. If you are sensitive to PWM flicker or spend long hours in front of the screen, this monitor is noticeably more comfortable than earlier OLEDs. The Neo Proximity Sensor is a neat trick: a sensor on the bezel detects when you leave your chair and switches the display to a black screen within seconds, which is great for avoiding burn-in when you walk away for a coffee.

The panel itself is identical in color performance to the PG27UCDM, with 99% DCI-P3 and Delta E < 2 accuracy. For a 27-inch 4K OLED, it is almost impossible to fault. The only real drawback is the lack of DisplayPort 2.1; if you own a future graphics card that could use the extra bandwidth, you might want to step up to the PG27UCDM. But for the vast majority of current systems, DP 1.4 with DSC works flawlessly.

---

3. LG 32GX850A-B UltraGear: Best Dual-Mode 4K OLED

Pros

• Dual-mode: 4K at 165Hz or FHD at 330Hz via hotkey
• Glossy WOLED panel with Micro Lens Array+ for brightness
• Three UL certifications for eye comfort (flicker-free, low blue light, anti-glare)
• Full ergonomic stand with tilt, height, swivel, and pivot
• G-SYNC Compatible and FreeSync Premium Pro

Cons

• Only 165Hz in 4K mode (others offer 240Hz)
• WOLED panel has slightly less color volume than QD-OLED
• Stand is large and not the most stable

Best for Competitive gamers who want to play single-player games in 4K and then switch to a super-smooth 330Hz mode for fast-paced shooters.

Check current price on Amazon →

The LG 32GX850A-B is the oddball in this list because it uses a glossy WOLED panel instead of QD-OLED, and it prioritizes dual-mode flexibility over raw speed. In its native 4K mode, the refresh rate is 165Hz, which is lower than the 240Hz you get from the ASUS and MSI QD-OLEDs. But the dual-mode feature lets you press a hotkey and switch to a 1080p resolution running at 330Hz. That 330Hz makes a real difference in games like Valorant or Counter-Strike, where every frame matters. The glossy finish also means the image looks incredibly sharp and three-dimensional when you are in a dark room, because there is no anti-glare coating to diffuse the light.

Where the LG struggles is in color volume. The WOLED panel hits about 98.5% DCI-P3, which is close but not quite as saturated as QD-OLED monitors. The brightness is decent thanks to Micro Lens Array+ (typical 275 nits), but HDR highlights don't hit the same peaks as the QD-OLED competitors. The stand is also the most fully featured here, with pivot, swivel, and height adjustment, but it is wide and the monitor wobbles a bit if your desk is shaky.

---

4. MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED: Best 32-Inch Alternative to the ASUS Swift

Pros

• Same 32-inch QD-OLED panel as the PG32UCDM at a different price point
• Built-in KVM switch and picture-by-picture modes
• MSI Gaming Intelligence AI offers dynamic crosshair and shadow boost
• OLED Care 2.0 with multiple pixel refresh routines
• 90W USB-C, HDMI 2.1, DP 1.4a

Cons

• No DisplayPort 2.1
• Stand is solid but not as polished as ASUS's
• No proximity sensor (relies on manual settings for OLED care)

Best for Users who want the same 32-inch QD-OLED technology as the ASUS Swift but prefer MSI's KVM functionality and AI gaming features.

Check current price on Amazon →

The MSI MPG 321URX is effectively the same 32-inch QD-OLED panel that MSI buys from Samsung Display, the same one used in the ASUS PG32UCDM. That means the same 240Hz refresh rate, same 0.03ms response, same 99% DCI-P3, and the same VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification. The differences are in the firmware and feature set. MSI includes a KVM switch, which lets you share a keyboard and mouse between two connected PCs or a PC and a laptop. That is a genuinely useful feature if you have a work machine and a gaming rig sharing one desk. The Gaming Intelligence AI features, like dynamic crosshair and shadow boost, are gimmicks for most people but could be useful if you tweak settings per game.

The build quality is solid, and the four-way adjustable stand works well, though it lacks the premium feel of the ASUS stand. MSI's OLED Care 2.0 offers automatic pixel refresh, panel shift, and a taskbar notification, but there is no proximity sensor like the ASUS Neo Proximity Sensor, so you have to rely on the software or a timer. For most users, that is not a dealbreaker, but it is worth knowing.

---

5. ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCWMG: Best for Competitive Shooters (480Hz Dual-Mode)

Pros

• Dual-mode: 4K at 240Hz and FHD at 480Hz
• TrueBlack Glossy panel with zero haze for exceptional sharpness
• Neo Proximity Sensor for automatic burn-in protection
• AI Assistant with dynamic crosshair and shadow boost
• HDMI 2.1 and DP 1.4 (DSC)

Cons

• Only 15W USB-C (cannot charge a laptop)
• WOLED panel lacks the color saturation of QD-OLED
• Stand is okay but no pivot

Best for Hardcore competitive gamers who want the highest possible refresh rate in FHD mode and a glossy screen for maximum contrast in a controlled lighting room.

Check current price on Amazon →

The ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCWMG is the dual-mode equivalent of the Swift PG32UCDM but using a glossy WOLED panel instead of QD-OLED. The headline feature is the dual-mode that goes to 480Hz in FHD. That is the highest refresh rate in this roundup, and in a game where frame times are everything, 480Hz is genuinely smoother than 240Hz. The TrueBlack Glossy coating is also unique among these monitors: it has no anti-glare haze, so the image looks like a mirror in terms of sharpness, with incredible depth. In a dark room, this monitor is stunning.

The downside is that the WOLED panel has less color volume than QD-OLED. The 99% DCI-P3 claim is still there, but in practice, reds and greens are not as rich as on the PG32UCDM, and the peak brightness in HDR is lower. The USB-C port only delivers 15W, so it cannot charge a laptop. This monitor is built for one specific type of buyer: someone who plays both story games at 4K 240Hz and competitive shooters at FHD 480Hz, and who already has a dark room to get the most out of the glossy screen.

---

6. ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM: Best for DisplayPort 2.1a and Uncompressed 4K 240Hz

Pros

• DisplayPort 2.1a UHBR20 with full 80Gbps bandwidth (no DSC needed)
• Fourth-gen QD-OLED with sharp text and anti-flicker tech
• 90W USB-C and Dolby Vision support
• Neo Proximity Sensor and OLED Care Pro
• Three-year warranty with burn-in coverage

Cons

• 27-inch size might be too small for some users
• No dual-mode (240Hz is the max)
• Expensive compared to the XG27UCDMG

Best for Early adopters who want the latest connection standard and maximum bandwidth to future-proof their monitor for upcoming GPUs.

Check current price on Amazon →

The ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM is the premium 27-inch option that adds DisplayPort 2.1a UHBR20, which can push 4K at 240Hz without any display stream compression. For the majority of users, DSC is imperceptible, but if you are sensitive to artifacts or want to save that GPU overhead, this is the monitor that gives you pure signal. It also includes Dolby Vision support, which is rare in monitors and makes HDR movies and games look even better.

In every other way, it is the same fourth-gen QD-OLED panel as the XG27UCDMG, with the same anti-flicker 2.0, same Neo Proximity Sensor, and same color accuracy. The ergonomic stand is good, and the inclusion of a tripod socket is a nice touch for streamers who mount a camera. The main competition is price: you are paying a premium for the DP 2.1a port, and if you don't need it, the XG27UCDMG is the smarter choice.

---

7. ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDMR: Best 32-Inch with DisplayPort 2.1

Pros

• 32-inch QD-OLED with 240Hz, 0.03ms, true 10-bit
• DisplayPort 2.1 (DP80 cable included) for uncompressed bandwidth
• Neo Proximity Sensor and OLED Care Pro
• 90W USB-C for laptop charging
• Uniform brightness setting for consistent luminance

Cons

• Identical panel to the PG32UCDM except for DP 2.1
• No dual-mode
• Stand is the same large footprint as the PG32UCDM

Best for Anyone who wants the 32-inch QD-OLED experience but insists on having the latest DisplayPort standard for a clean signal path.

Check current price on Amazon →

The ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDMR is basically the PG32UCDM with a DisplayPort 2.1 port swapped in place of the DP 1.4. It also comes with a DP80 cable in the box, so you can run 4K 240Hz with 10-bit color and HDR without any compression from the moment you plug it in. The panel itself is the same excellent QD-OLED, and the Neo Proximity Sensor is present, which is a welcome addition compared to the original PG32UCDM that launched without it.

If you already own a PG32UCDM, there is no reason to upgrade. But if you are buying new and own a current or future graphics card that supports DP 2.1 (like the AMD Radeon RX 7000 series or upcoming Nvidia cards), the PG32UCDMR is the version to target. It avoids the slight bandwidth limitations of HDMI 2.1 and DP 1.4, though in practice most users will not notice the difference.

---

8. Alienware AW3425DW: Best Ultrawide QD-OLED Monitor

Pros

• 34-inch 1800R curved QD-OLED with ultrawide 3440×1440 resolution
• 240Hz and 0.03ms with FreeSync Premium Pro and G-SYNC Compatible
• VESA DisplayHDR TrueBlack 400 with 1000 nits peak brightness
• Delta E < 2 color accuracy and 99.3% DCI-P3
• Premium Alienware build quality with customizable lighting

Cons

• Not true 4K (WQHD resolution, 3440×1440)
• Limited to 240Hz, no dual-mode
• Stand is large and the monitor is heavy

Best for Gamers who want the immersive experience of a curved ultrawide and cannot give up OLED's color quality and contrast.

Check current price on Amazon →

The Alienware AW3425DW is the only ultrawide in this roundup, and it is a different beast from the 16:9 monitors. The 34-inch 1800R curve wraps around your field of view, making games like racing sims, open-world RPGs, and flight sims feel much more immersive. The QD-OLED panel here is the same generation used in the 32-inch models, so you get the same vibrant colors and infinite contrast. The peak brightness of 1000 nits in HDR is actually higher than some of the 32-inch panels, and the DisplayHDR TrueBlack 400 certification ensures that blacks remain black.

The obvious caveat is that this is not a 4K monitor. The resolution is 3440×1440, which is a common ultrawide resolution. For gaming, the pixel density is still very good for a 34-inch screen, and the frame rates you can reach are higher because there are fewer pixels to push. For productivity, the extra horizontal space is fantastic for multitasking, but you will see slightly less vertical space compared to a 32-inch 16:9. If you want the pure immersion of an ultrawide, this Alienware is the best QD-OLED option available today.

---

Buyer's Guide: How to Choose a 4K OLED Monitor

Before you decide which 4K OLED monitor to buy, there are a few critical factors that separate a great choice from a regrettable one. OLED technology is still evolving, and the differences between panel types, refresh rates, and features can be confusing.

Panel Technology: QD-OLED vs. WOLED

The two main panel technologies powering today's 4K OLED monitors are QD-OLED (used by Samsung Display and adopted by ASUS, MSI, and Alienware) and WOLED (used by LG Display). QD-OLED uses a blue OLED layer with quantum dots that convert blue light into red and green, resulting in a wider color gamut and higher volume. In practice, QD-OLED monitors hit 99% DCI-P3 and look noticeably richer in saturated reds and greens. They also tend to have higher peak brightness in HDR.

WOLED, on the other hand, uses an OLED stack with white subpixels and a color filter. The latest WOLED panels (like the ones in the LG 32GX850A and ASUS XG32UCWMG) have a glossy finish and Micro Lens Array+ that boosts brightness. WOLED panels can appear punchier in a dark room because the glossy coating eliminates haze. However, they have slightly lower color volume, and the white subpixel structure can make text look slightly softer than on QD-OLED.

Who should choose what? If you do creative work or want the most vibrant HDR gaming, QD-OLED is the way to go. If you are a competitive gamer who values a sharp, reflective glossy image and can control the room lighting, a glossy WOLED might actually look better day to day.

Refresh Rate and Dual-Mode

All the monitors here run at 240Hz (except the LG at 165Hz and the XG32UCWMG at 240Hz/480Hz dual-mode). For most people, 240Hz is already beyond what the human eye can reliably perceive as smoother than 165Hz, but the main benefit is that it matches the maximum frame rate modern GPUs can push in less-demanding titles.

Dual-mode monitors let you switch between a 4K resolution at one refresh rate and a lower resolution at a much higher refresh rate. This is useful if you play both high-fidelity single-player games and fast multiplayer shooters. The LG offers 4K at 165Hz and FHD at 330Hz. The ASUS XG32UCWMG goes to 480Hz in FHD mode. The trade-off is that the WOLED panels used here have slightly less color accuracy. If you never play competitive shooters, dual-mode is not a feature you need.

Connectivity: DisplayPort 2.1, HDMI 2.1, and DSC

Driving a 4K 240Hz 10-bit HDR signal requires about 65 Gbps of bandwidth. HDMI 2.1 can do 48 Gbps, and DisplayPort 1.4 can do 32.4 Gbps. Both rely on Display Stream Compression (DSC) to hit the full resolution and refresh rate. DSC is visually lossless for most content, but some users with calibrated displays report artifacts in very specific gradients.

DisplayPort 2.1a UHBR20 offers 80 Gbps, enough to run 4K 240Hz without any compression. The PG27UCDM and PG32UCDMR have DP 2.1 ports. If you own a current high-end AMD GPU (RX 7000 series) or plan to buy a future Nvidia card that supports DP 2.1, getting a monitor with DP 2.1 could future-proof your setup. For most people, DSC works fine, and the cost premium for DP 2.1 is not necessary.

OLED Care and Burn-In Prevention

All modern OLED monitors include features to reduce the risk of burn-in. The most effective are pixel shift (which moves the image slightly every few minutes), automatic pixel refresh (which runs when the monitor is in standby), and logo detection (which dims static elements). The best monitors also include a proximity sensor that detects when you walk away and turns the screen off, like the ASUS Neo Proximity Sensor. ASUS and MSI offer three-year warranties that explicitly cover burn-in, which is important peace of mind.

Size and Form Factor

The biggest decision is between 27-inch and 32-inch. A 27-inch 4K monitor has a very high pixel density (163 PPI), making text and fine details extremely sharp. Some people find it gives too much screen real estate for a single window, but it is excellent for gaming because you don't have to turn your head. A 32-inch monitor (140 PPI) offers more usable space for multitasking and feels more immersive in games, but the lower pixel density is still excellent. There is also the ultrawide path: 34-inch 3440×1440 gives you around 110 PPI, which is fine if you prioritize width over vertical resolution.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Is 4K OLED worth it for gaming?

Yes, if you can drive it with a powerful graphics card. The combination of infinite contrast, instant response times, and vibrant colors makes games look dramatically better than on any LCD. The 240Hz refresh rate is also fast enough for competitive play, though you need a top-tier GPU to reach that frame rate in modern titles.

What is the difference between QD-OLED and WOLED?

QD-OLED uses a blue OLED layer and quantum dots to produce color, resulting in a wider color gamut and higher brightness. WOLED uses white OLED and a color filter, which typically has a glossy finish that improves perceived contrast but has slightly lower color volume. QD-OLED is generally preferred for color-critical work, while glossy WOLED can look punchier in a dark room.

Do OLED monitors suffer from burn-in?

Yes, OLED displays can permanently retain static images if the same bright elements are shown for very long periods. However, modern 4K OLED monitors include pixel shift, automatic pixel refresh, and logo dimming to mitigate this. Most manufacturers now offer three-year warranties that cover burn-in. Normal varied usage (gaming, browsing, video) is unlikely to cause visible burn-in within that period.

What is dual-mode and who needs it?

Dual-mode monitors allow you to switch between a highָה-high resolution (e.g., 4K) at a moderate refresh rate and a lower resolution (e.g., FHD) at a very high refresh rate. It is useful for gamers who play both graphically rich single-player titles and competitive shooters where a higher frame rate gives a competitive edge. If you only play one type of game, you probably don't need it.

Is a 27-inch or 32-inch 4K OLED better for productivity?

For productivity, the 32-inch size gives you more screen real estate, which is helpful for multitasking with multiple windows. The 27-inch has a higher pixel density, making text extremely sharp. Both are fine; the choice depends on your desk space and whether you prefer to stack windows or use a single monitor with a lot of space.

Do I need DisplayPort 2.1 for 4K 240Hz?

Not really. DisplayPort 1.4 and HDMI 2.1 with DSC can handle 4K 240Hz with virtually no visual loss. DisplayPort 2.1 is only necessary if you want to avoid any compression at all, or if you plan to connect multiple high-resolution monitors via daisy chain. For the single-monitor setup, DSC is fine.

What is the warranty on these monitors?

Most of the monitors here come with a three-year warranty that includes coverage for burn-in. ASUS and MSI explicitly mention burn-in coverage. Alienware typically provides a three-year warranty as well. Always check the specific terms for the region you are buying in, but the trend is positive for OLED longevity.

---

Final Verdict

The ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM remains the best 4K OLED monitor you can buy for most people, balancing excellent image quality, a proven heatsink design, and a 240Hz refresh rate at a point where the technology has matured. If you want the same panel but with a KVM switch and a different software suite, the MSI MPG 321URX is a strong alternative. For competitive players who need dual-mode, the LG 32GX850A-B and ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCWMG both deliver, with the LG offering more ergonomic flexibility and the ASUS pushing the refresh rate to 480Hz. If you prefer a 27-inch screen, the ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM gives you the option of uncompressed DisplayPort 2.1a, while the XG27UCDMG gives you the same panel at a lower investment. The Alienware AW3425DW is the clear choice if you want an ultrawide immersive experience with QD-OLED quality. For any reader still undecided, start with the size you want and then pick the monitor that has the burner warranty you feel comfortable with; the overall image quality across these eight is excellent, and you will be happy with any of them.

This article contains Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission on qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.