Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The best LG UltraGear monitors ranked: 9 top picks from budget 1080p to flagship OLED, with specs, prices, and who each one suits best.
The problem with buying an LG UltraGear monitor is not finding one. It's choosing between nine panels that all look credible on paper and then realizing, after an hour of tab-switching, that you've learned nothing. A 240Hz OLED and a 180Hz VA panel are both marketed in the same breathless language, and the gap between them in practice is enormous.
The best LG UltraGear monitors span a genuinely wide range: flat IPS for competitive play, deep-curve VA for immersion, OLED for people who want blacks that actually look black, ultrawide for simulation and productivity, and 4K for those who want both resolution and speed in one panel. Every pick here is a current, available product, and the range runs from under $140 to over $1,100, so nearly every use case and budget has a clear answer.
This guide covers nine monitors sorted by how we'd recommend them: strongest overall first, then by use case and price tier. Whether you game mostly in first-person shooters, content-create on the side, or want the one panel that can do everything, the right one is in here.
TL;DR: The LG 27GS60QC-B curved QHD is the one most people should buy right now: genuinely immersive, fast, and priced for reality. The LG 27GX704A-B is the OLED sweet spot if you want true-black picture quality without spending as much as the 27GS93QE. The LG 32GX850A-B is the pick for those who want 4K OLED and a panel that can flip to 330Hz on demand. The LG 27GS50F-B covers the budget end without embarrassing itself.
| # | Product | Panel / Size | Resolution | Refresh Rate | Price | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LG 27GS60QC-B | VA Curved 27" | QHD 2560×1440 | 180Hz | $185.99 | Best overall value |
| 2 | LG 27GX704A-B | OLED Glossy 27" | QHD 2560×1440 | 240Hz | $459.99 | Best OLED value |
| 3 | LG 27GS93QE | OLED Anti-Glare 27" | QHD 2560×1440 | 240Hz | $551.76 | Best premium OLED |
| 4 | LG 27G640A-B | IPS 27" | QHD 2560×1440 | 300Hz | $297.20 | Fastest IPS for competitive |
| 5 | LG 27GR83Q-B | IPS 27" | QHD 2560×1440 | 240Hz | $319.99 | IPS with DTS audio |
| 6 | LG 27GS50F-B | VA Flat 27" | FHD 1920×1080 | 180Hz | $129.99 | Budget 27" |
| 7 | LG 24G411A-B | IPS Flat 24" | FHD 1920×1080 | 144Hz (OC) | $139.99 | Compact budget IPS |
| 8 | LG 32GX850A-B | OLED Glossy 32" | 4K 3840×2160 | 165Hz / 330Hz | $759.50 | 4K OLED dual-mode |
| 9 | LG 45GX900A-B | OLED Curved 45" | WQHD 3440×1440 | 240Hz | $1,162.67 | Ultrawide immersion |
Prices change frequently. Check the links for real-time pricing.
Not every UltraGear is created equal, and the spec sheet rarely tells the whole story. These are the factors that actually separate good picks from mediocre ones in this lineup:

The LG 27GS60QC-B is the monitor most people asking about UltraGear will end up happiest with, and the reason is simple: it delivers QHD resolution with a 1000R curve and 180Hz refresh at a price that doesn't require justification. That combination sits in a gap the rest of the lineup doesn't quite cover.
The 1000R curve is steep enough to actually matter. Unlike the mild 1500R or 1800R curves you see on competitors, the 1000R wraps the edges into your peripheral vision in a way that makes open-world games and anything with a wide field of view feel deliberately constructed around your seating position. Paired with QHD (2560×1440) resolution, text and UI elements are noticeably sharper than on any 1080p panel at this size, which matters if the monitor also sees some work or browsing. The 1ms GtG response and AMD FreeSync with up to 180Hz keeps motion clean throughout.
The honest caveat here is panel technology. This is a VA panel, not IPS or OLED, so horizontal viewing angles are adequate rather than great. Sit straight on and it looks excellent. Look at it from the side during co-op gaming and the colors shift noticeably. The HDR10 support is present but limited by peak brightness in the way most VA monitors are. If those trade-offs don't apply to your situation, this is the sweet spot in the entire UltraGear range for the money. The on-screen tools (Black Stabilizer, Dynamic Action Sync, crosshair overlay, FPS counter) are the same suite shared across the premium models, so nothing is missing in terms of gameplay aids.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: PC gamers who want immersive QHD gaming at a mid-range price and play primarily from a fixed position directly in front of the monitor.
Check current price on Amazon →

The LG 27GX704A-B is where the best LG UltraGear monitors take a significant step forward. This is a 27-inch QHD OLED panel with a glossy finish and 240Hz, and the glossy surface is a meaningful choice. Compared to the matte-coated 27GS93QE, the glossy finish on this panel produces richer blacks and more saturated colors in controlled lighting. The trade-off is obvious: reflections are real, and a bright room will fight you. But for gaming in a darker setup, the glossy display makes colors look like they're lit from inside the panel rather than projected onto a milky surface.
The core OLED specs match what this category promises. At 0.03ms response time, there is no ghosting in any practical gaming scenario. The 240Hz ceiling is reachable from a modern GPU, and both NVIDIA G-SYNC compatibility and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro validation are confirmed. Brightness peaks at 1300 nits in HDR, and the VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification means the dark-scene performance is not a marketing footnote but a measured standard. DCI-P3 coverage hits 98.5%, which puts color fidelity at a level that also makes this a usable display for creative work when the gaming session ends.
The stand is fully adjustable: height, tilt, swivel, and pivot are all here, which the curved QHD pick above lacks. The Hexagon lighting on the back is understated if you don't want a glowing desk, and prominent enough to see if you do. OLED care features (automatic pixel cleaning during standby) run in the background and don't require manual management.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: Serious PC gamers who primarily play in a controlled-light environment and want the most visually impressive 27-inch QHD OLED available at a price point below the 27GS93QE.
Check current price on Amazon →

The LG 27GS93QE is the other OLED QHD 27-inch in the lineup, and the distinction that matters most between it and the 27GX704A-B is the surface treatment. Where the 27GX704A-B goes glossy, this one uses LG's anti-glare, low-reflection OLED coating. If your gaming setup includes natural light from a window, overhead fluorescent lighting, or any bright ambient source, this panel handles that situation with less fight than its glossy sibling.
The specs on the two are close: same 27-inch QHD OLED, same 240Hz, same 0.03ms, same G-SYNC and FreeSync Premium Pro compatibility, same DisplayHDR True Black 400 with a 1.5M:1 contrast ratio and 98.5% DCI-P3 coverage. The 2-year warranty covering the OLED panel specifically is a meaningful commitment given the category's burn-in concerns, and it's spelled out clearly. The fully adjustable stand (height, tilt, pivot) gives full ergonomic flexibility.
What you don't get for the higher price over the 27GX704A-B is a clearly superior panel, just a different one suited to a different room. If you game in a darker setup and want maximum visual punch, the glossy version wins. If you game in ambient light or a shared space with windows, this anti-glare version is the smarter pick.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: Gamers who want premium OLED QHD performance and play in a room with significant ambient or natural light that a glossy finish would turn into a mirror.
Check current price on Amazon →

The LG 27G640A-B is for one type of buyer specifically: someone who plays competitive titles at high frame rates, has a GPU that can actually approach 300fps in those games, and doesn't want to pay OLED prices. At 300Hz with 1ms GtG and QHD resolution, this is the fastest IPS panel in the UltraGear lineup reviewed here.
In competitive FPS gaming, the difference between 240Hz and 300Hz is smaller than the jump from 144Hz to 240Hz, but it's not nothing. Players who have already tuned their setup around minimizing input latency will notice the incremental smoothness, particularly during rapid camera movement. The IPS panel keeps wide viewing angles and consistent color accuracy that VA panels can't match off-axis, and DCI-P3 coverage at up to 95% means this doesn't look washed out beside the more expensive options.
The connectivity story is unusually strong for a non-OLED panel: USB Type-C with 15W power delivery joins HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4. That Type-C port is genuinely useful for anyone running a laptop alongside their desktop, connecting a MacBook or gaming laptop with a single cable for display and basic charging. The stand covers height, tilt, swivel, and pivot. Nothing is missing here except the OLED contrast ratio and the price.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: Competitive FPS and MOBA players who prioritize maximum refresh rate and smooth IPS color over deep contrast, and whose GPU can realistically drive close to 300fps.
Check current price on Amazon →

The LG 27GR83Q-B shares its core spec sheet with a lot of competitors at this price tier: 27-inch QHD IPS, 240Hz, 1ms GtG, G-SYNC Compatible, FreeSync Premium, HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort. What separates it from the crowd is a DTS Headphone:X implementation that uses a dedicated 4-pole headphone jack to carry both stereo audio and a mono microphone signal through a single connection. For people gaming with a headset plugged directly into the monitor rather than a separate DAC or the PC's rear panel, this is a more complete audio path than the 3.5mm jacks on most competing panels.
Color accuracy holds up well here, with 95% DCI-P3 coverage and VESA DisplayHDR 400. The stand adjusts for height, tilt, and pivot. Nothing about this monitor is revolutionary, but the build feels solid and the IPS panel's wide viewing angles make it a reasonable choice for a monitor that also serves as a shared screen or secondary display.
Where the 27G640A-B above this pick steps ahead is purely in refresh rate (300Hz versus 240Hz) and the USB Type-C port. If you don't need either, and you do use a headset plugged into the monitor rather than your PC, the 27GR83Q-B saves money and adds genuine audio functionality in exchange.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: Gamers who plug a headset directly into the monitor and want a competent 240Hz QHD IPS without paying a premium for refresh rate beyond what most setups can use.
Check current price on Amazon →

The LG 27GS50F-B is the entry point for the UltraGear name, and the honest summary is that it delivers what it promises without pretending to be something it isn't. At 27 inches with Full HD (1920×1080) resolution and a 180Hz refresh rate, the pixel density is noticeably softer than the QHD options on this list. Sitting 60cm from a 27-inch 1080p panel, you will see individual pixels in UI text and in the details of game assets. That's the trade-off at this price tier.
What you do get is 180Hz with AMD FreeSync, 1ms MBR, and HDR10 support in a three-side borderless design. For gamers running mid-to-lower-end GPUs who cannot realistically drive 1440p at high frame rates, this monitor is a smarter match than a QHD panel that would require dropping settings to maintain acceptable frame rates anyway. The on-screen gaming tools (Black Stabilizer, crosshair, FPS counter, Dynamic Action Sync) are fully present, and dual HDMI ports plus DisplayPort cover a console-plus-PC dual connection scenario cleanly.
It is a tilt-only stand, which becomes a real ergonomic limitation over time. That's the concession the budget tier makes here, not the panel or the speeds.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: Budget-conscious gamers with mid-range GPUs who want the UltraGear build and feature set at the lowest entry price, and are primarily playing at distances where 1080p is acceptable.
Check current price on Amazon →

The LG 24G411A-B makes a case the 27GS50F-B above can't quite make: at 24 inches with Full HD, the pixel density is comfortable and text looks appropriately sharp. The panel is IPS, which is a meaningful step up in off-axis viewing and color consistency compared to the 27-inch VA-style entry above. For a tight desk, a secondary monitor, or a bedroom setup where size needs to stay manageable, this is the more defensible budget pick.
The 120Hz native refresh rate overclocking to 144Hz is an honest specification: the panel is built for 120Hz and will run at 144Hz with OC enabled, which works but may introduce minor instability compared to a natively 144Hz panel in edge cases at maximum refresh. In everyday use at 120Hz or 144Hz, the difference from "native vs. OC" is imperceptible. The 1ms MBR keeps motion sharp, and both NVIDIA G-SYNC compatibility and AMD FreeSync are validated.
LG's Switch app support, which lets you split the screen into up to six zones and launch video calls with a hotkey, is a nice extra for people who also use this desk for remote work. The ultra-slim bezel and minimal stand footprint leave the desk feeling less crowded than a larger panel.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: Students, secondary-monitor buyers, or anyone who needs a competent IPS gaming display in a compact form factor at a low price.
Check current price on Amazon →

The LG 32GX850A-B introduces something the rest of this lineup doesn't have: a dual-mode toggle. At 4K UHD (3840×2160), this 32-inch glossy OLED panel runs at up to 165Hz, which is already a significant achievement in itself. Toggle the hotkey and it switches to Full HD at up to 330Hz. That's the fastest refresh rate available on any monitor in this roundup, and the flexibility to switch between the two modes with a hotkey rather than digging through menus makes this a genuinely practical feature rather than a spec-sheet talking point.
The glossy OLED surface uses Micro Lens Array Plus technology that LG says produces more brightness and improved viewing angles than its previous OLED panels, with a typical brightness of 275 nits. The 1.5M:1 contrast ratio and VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification are here. The 0.03ms response time applies at both resolution modes. G-SYNC Compatible and FreeSync Premium Pro validation covers both GPU camps.
The panel is three UL-certified (anti-glare, flicker-free, low blue light), which reads as a set of marketing claims for comfort categories but matters genuinely for long sessions. Ergonomics are complete: height, tilt, swivel, and pivot. At 32 inches this is a substantial desk presence, and at the price it carries, it should be.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: Gamers who want the best single 4K display they can buy and want to retain a fast-refresh competitive option for when resolution isn't the priority.
Check current price on Amazon →

The LG 45GX900A-B is built around a single premise: more screen, aggressively curved, OLED fast, and nothing else. At 45 inches with a WQHD (3440×1440) resolution and an 800R curve, this is a monitor that changes the nature of a gaming setup rather than simply improving an existing one.
The 800R curvature is the steepest in this lineup. LG makes a specific claim worth understanding: a 45-inch ultrawide at 21:9 gives more usable screen area than a 49-inch 32:9 super-ultrawide. That checks out geometrically and also avoids the extreme neck-turn that very wide 32:9 panels impose. Racing simulators, space games, and open-world RPGs become something close to peripheral-filling at this curvature and size. OLED at 240Hz and 0.03ms means the fast edge of the experience is also covered.
Connectivity is appropriately serious: HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4, and USB Type-C with 65W power delivery. The 65W USB-C is the highest power delivery in the lineup and covers charging a laptop at meaningful speed alongside video input. G-SYNC Compatible and FreeSync Premium Pro are validated. The 2-year OLED panel warranty applies here, which is a comfort at this price.
This is the most expensive monitor in the roundup by a significant margin. It makes sense for sim racers, flight sim enthusiasts, and players who spend extended hours in immersive single-player games. It does not make sense as a competitive FPS monitor because the ultrawide aspect ratio is not supported in most ranked game modes.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: Simulation gamers, open-world players, and anyone who wants the most immersive single display available and has the desk space and GPU to match it.
Check current price on Amazon →
The UltraGear lineup covers enough ground that buying the wrong one is easy. The key is matching the panel technology and size to your actual use case rather than defaulting to the highest refresh rate you can afford.
This is the single most important variable and the one most buyers underweight. VA panels like the 27GS60QC-B deliver strong contrast and deep blacks for an LCD, with the trade-off of reduced off-axis accuracy. IPS panels (27GR83Q-B, 27G640A-B, 24G411A-B) offer better color consistency across viewing angles and are the standard for competitive gaming where a predictable image matters more than deep blacks. OLED panels (27GS93QE, 27GX704A-B, 32GX850A-B, 45GX900A-B) produce genuinely black pixels by turning individual LEDs off, and the contrast ratio is not comparable to LCD technology. The OLED options in this lineup start around $460 and climb from there. Below that price, you're choosing between VA and IPS.
The gap between 60Hz and 144Hz is transformative. The gap between 144Hz and 240Hz is clear but smaller. The gap between 240Hz and 300Hz requires a benchmarking tool to verify in most game scenarios. Before prioritizing maximum refresh rate, check what frame rates your GPU actually achieves in your most-played titles at the target resolution. A 300Hz monitor playing at 120fps because the GPU can't push further is a 300Hz monitor performing like a 120Hz one. Match the ceiling to what your system can realistically drive.
At 24 inches, Full HD (1920×1080) looks comfortable. At 27 inches, 1080p shows its limits in pixel density, and 1440p (QHD) is noticeably sharper. At 32 inches, 4K (UHD) starts to justify itself clearly. At 45 inches ultrawide, WQHD (3440×1440) distributes pixels across a large surface and at typical desk distances still looks clean. The 27GS50F-B at 1080p is fine for a monitor viewed from further back or for a budget-constrained buyer who accepts the trade-off consciously.
Every monitor in this lineup supports AMD FreeSync at minimum. The competitive picks (27GX704A-B, 27GS93QE, 27GR83Q-B, 27G640A-B, 32GX850A-B, 45GX900A-B) are also validated by NVIDIA as G-SYNC Compatible. This means they function with both major GPU brands' adaptive sync implementations. G-SYNC Compatible validation from NVIDIA means the monitor has been tested and confirmed to deliver tear-free performance, not just labeled FreeSync and theoretically compatible.
Console players running at high refresh rates need HDMI 2.1. Most of the picks above this budget tier include it. PC-only players are fine with DisplayPort 1.4 for the primary connection. Laptop users who want a single-cable desk connection should look at the 27G640A-B (USB Type-C at 15W) or the 45GX900A-B (USB Type-C at 65W). The 65W on the ultrawide charges a modern laptop at meaningful speed; the 15W on the IPS QHD is supplementary charging only.
For pure competitive play, the LG 27G640A-B is the strongest IPS option at 300Hz with 1ms and QHD resolution. If you play in a dark room and want OLED response times, either the 27GX704A-B or 27GS93QE (both 240Hz OLED) are the faster-feeling option even at a lower refresh rate ceiling, because OLED response time at 0.03ms eliminates ghosting entirely.
For competitive gaming where frame rate and response time are the priority, IPS is perfectly competitive. The case for OLED is strongest in games with dark environments, HDR content, or where the visual experience matters as much as the competitive edge. The blacks on OLED are a different category entirely from LCD, and once you see a well-calibrated OLED in a dark scene, IPS contrast looks clearly compromised by comparison. Whether that's worth $150-300 extra depends on the games you play.
Yes, with the right connectivity. The PS5 and Xbox Series X support up to 4K/120Hz via HDMI 2.1. The monitors in this lineup that include HDMI 2.1 (27GS93QE, 27GX704A-B, 27GR83Q-B, 27G640A-B, 32GX850A-B, 45GX900A-B) support high-refresh console connections. The budget picks (27GS50F-B, 24G411A-B) use HDMI 2.0, which limits console connections to 60Hz at full resolution.
LG's OLED care tools run automatically during standby and shutdown to perform pixel refreshing cycles. Beyond that, avoid displaying static elements (like a taskbar or HUD overlay) at the same screen position for extended periods without breaks. Using the Black Stabilizer feature that dims very dark areas, and enabling screen savers or OS-level sleep timers, reduces the cumulative risk. The 2-year OLED panel warranties on several of these models provide coverage if panel degradation occurs.
GtG (gray-to-gray) measures how quickly a pixel transitions between two gray values, reflecting real-world motion blur in games. MBR (Motion Blur Reduction) is a backlight strobe technique that reduces perceived blur by briefly dimming the backlight between frames. Both produce sharper motion, but they work differently. GtG is the more commonly compared spec across panels, and MBR typically cannot run simultaneously with variable refresh rate (FreeSync/G-SYNC) enabled. OLED panels like those in this lineup achieve 0.03ms GtG naturally, without needing MBR.
The OLED panels (27GS93QE, 27GX704A-B, 32GX850A-B) offer 98.5% DCI-P3 coverage and true-black contrast that makes them genuinely capable creative displays. The 32GX850A-B in particular at 4K OLED provides the resolution and color accuracy that photo and video editing benefit from. The IPS options (27G640A-B, 27GR83Q-B) at 95% DCI-P3 are also solid for creative work. The budget FHD picks are not ideal for color-critical work given the lower resolution and more limited color gamut coverage.
Yes, particularly the models with HDMI 2.1 ports. The 27GS60QC-B curved QHD is a notable console-friendly choice at a reasonable price since QHD at 27 inches pairs well with the PS5's 1440p support added in recent firmware updates. For Xbox Series X at 4K/120Hz, the 32GX850A-B covers the resolution and refresh combination fully. The ultrawide 45GX900A-B is less suitable for console gaming since most console titles don't support 21:9 aspect ratio natively.
The best LG UltraGear monitor for most people remains the LG 27GS60QC-B: it covers the core of what gaming monitors need to do, adds an immersive 1000R curve at QHD resolution, and prices itself at a point where the trade-offs are easy to accept. If your budget stretches further and you want genuine OLED performance, the LG 27GX704A-B is where the lineup makes a meaningful jump in visual quality, with a glossy OLED surface that rewards darker setups and a 240Hz ceiling that covers competitive gaming fully.
The LG 32GX850A-B is the pick for 4K gaming with the added bonus of a 330Hz mode for when you'd rather run lighter titles at maximum speed. The LG 45GX900A-B stands alone in the ultrawide segment: nothing else in this lineup approaches the immersive scale of that 45-inch OLED at 800R. For budget buyers, the choice between the 27GS50F-B and 24G411A-B mostly comes down to size preference and whether the sharper pixel density of a 24-inch IPS panel matters to you more than the larger screen area.
If you're genuinely undecided between the OLED options, buy based on your room's lighting: glossy OLED (27GX704A-B) for dark rooms, anti-glare OLED (27GS93QE) for rooms with windows or overhead light. The panel underneath is effectively identical.
This article contains Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission on qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.